Wan 2.5 vs 2.2

The arrival of Wan 2.5 has sparked intense discussions in the AI video generation community. Many people didn't expect the preview version to arrive so quickly, and what's even more surprising is that this model is not open-source. While the model is receiving very high praise from the public, our extensive testing reveals a more nuanced picture.

Executive Summary

After conducting 18 comprehensive test scenarios comparing Wan 2.5 Preview with Wan 2.2, here's what we found:

• Visual Quality: Wan 2.5 hasn't achieved a fundamental improvement in video generation consistency and aesthetic performance compared to 2.2
• Audio Innovation: The most stunning aspect of 2.5 is the native integration of sound and sound effects, transforming it into a truly multimodal large model
• Performance Parity: In many scenarios, Wan 2.2 actually outperforms 2.5 in terms of visual aesthetics and motion quality

The Game-Changer: Native Audio Generation

The most revolutionary feature of Wan 2.5 is its integrated audio generation capability. This isn't just background music - it's sophisticated sound design that includes:

• Speech synthesis with accurate lip synchronization
• Environmental sounds (wind, water, fire crackling)
• Sound effects precisely timed to visual actions
• Ambient audio that matches the scene atmosphere

How to Enable Audio Features

When using Wan 2.5, you must turn on the video sound effects switch to enable audio generation. This feature is available through:

1. Official Wan 2.5 Website: Direct access with limited free credits daily
2. Alternative Platforms: Some platforms like Quicksodian offer 7 days of free unlimited use
3. API Integration: Platforms like ComfyUI and RunningHub support API access (usually paid)

18 Test Scenarios: The Complete Comparison

We designed 18 different scenarios covering various aspects of video generation to provide an objective understanding of both models. Here are the key findings:

1. Sound-Driven Video Generation (S2V)

Test: Woman playing guitar and singing

Wan 2.5 Result:

• Beautiful scene with accurate lip movements
• Impressive lighting and shadow effects
• Detailed background elements (modeled wall, flowing curtains, window light)
• Synchronized audio with natural vocal quality

Winner: Wan 2.5 (unique feature)

2. Epic Battle Scene

Test: Western female warrior riding through battlefield

Wan 2.5:

• Excellent sound effects (horse hooves splashing, fire crackling)
• Good visual quality

Wan 2.2:

• Comparable aesthetic and motion effects
• Same visual quality level
• No audio (expected)

Winner: Tie on visuals

3. Precise Sound Generation

Test: Woman shouting "Hello, everyone" on mountaintop

Wan 2.5 Achievement:

• Wind sounds matching the mountaintop environment
• Voice projection feeling authentic to the scene
• Perfect audio-visual synchronization

Winner: Wan 2.5 (audio feature)

4. "World in a Box" Effect

Test: Box opening with environment emerging (inspired by Google V3)

Wan 2.5: Impressive popping-out effect Wan 2.2: More natural scene depiction, excellent physics

Winner: Tie - Different but equally impressive approaches

5. Micro Landscape: Bee Collecting Nectar

Test: Extreme close-up of bee on flower

Result: Wan 2.2 appears more realistic, while 2.5 shows wonderful micro landscape rendering

Winner: Wan 2.2 (slight edge on realism)

6. First-Person POV: Street Food Market

Test: Walking through bustling market

Wan 2.5:

• Authentic atmosphere
• Natural ambient sounds
• Good immersion

Wan 2.2:

• Good overall performance
• Less smooth camera movement
• Missing audio dimension

Winner: Wan 2.5 (camera smoothness + audio)

7. Traditional Scene with Speech

Test: Woman in hanfu clothing in garden

Wan 2.5 Features:

• Ambient sounds (birds chirping)
• Perfect lip-sync with speech: "This moment feels like a dream"
• 1920×1080 resolution

Wan 2.2:

• Good visual quality (832×480)
• No audio
• Comparable aesthetics

Winner: Wan 2.5 (audio + higher resolution)

8. Fantasy Creature: Dragon on Snowy Peak

Test: Western-style dragon roaring

Wan 2.5: Good overall effect with audio Wan 2.2: Reveals weakness of excessive motion (wing flapping over the top)

Note: Wan 2.2 uses reward LoRA to suppress exaggerated motion, but still acceptable visuals

Winner: Wan 2.5 (more controlled motion)

9. Cyberpunk Robot Scene

Test: Robot tapping virtual screen

Surprising Result: Wan 2.2 actually looks more beautiful in this case

• Better visual composition
• Superior character texture
• More convincing virtual screen feel

Winner: Wan 2.2 (visual superiority)

10. Sci-Fi Movie Feel: Elf Drawing Bow

Test: Forest elf preparing to shoot arrow

Wan 2.5 Audio Excellence:

• Sound of bow being drawn
• Power building up
• Arrow release sound
• Incredibly precise timing

Wan 2.2: Better overall impression despite lacking audio

Winner: Wan 2.2 on visuals, but 2.5 impressive on audio

11. Wizard Battle

Test: Two wizards fighting

Wan 2.5: Well-done sound effects Wan 2.2: Long shot with better overall motion and lightning effects

Winner: Wan 2.2 (superior visual effects)

12. Ink Drop in Water

Test: Drop of ink falling into water

Wan 2.2: More realistic, excellent motion sense Wan 2.5: Attempted ink wash painting style

Winner: Wan 2.2 (realism and motion quality)

13. Traditional Dance Performance

Test: Tang Dynasty women dancing in palace

Wan 2.5:

• Classical rhythm with appropriate instruments (cymbals)
• Era-appropriate audio

Wan 2.2:

• More narrative feel
• Person playing pipa in center
• Excellent atmosphere and aesthetics

Winner: Tie - Different artistic approaches

The Verdict: Real Upgrade or Hype?

Real Improvements ✅

1. Audio Generation: Revolutionary multimodal capability
2. Lip Synchronization: Highly accurate speech-to-video
3. Sound Design: Sophisticated environmental and effect sounds
4. Resolution: Higher default output (1920×1080 vs 832×480)

Where Wan 2.2 Holds Its Ground 💪

1. Visual Aesthetics: Often matches or exceeds 2.5
2. Motion Quality: More natural in many scenarios
3. Realism: Better physics and realistic rendering
4. Consistency: Proven stability

The Surprising Truth

In at least 3-4 scenarios out of 18, Wan 2.2's visual performance felt superior to Wan 2.5. This suggests that in terms of pure visual presentation and aesthetics, Wan 2.5 isn't significantly better than 2.2.

Who Should Use Which Version?

Choose Wan 2.5 If You Need:

• Audio integration in your videos
• Speech-to-video capabilities
• Higher resolution output
• Multimodal content creation
• Smooth camera movements

Stick with Wan 2.2 If You Want:

• Visual-only content
• Proven stability and consistency
• Better physics simulation
• More realistic rendering
• Cost-effective solution (if 2.5 is more expensive)

How to Access These Models

Wan 2.5 Official Website

• Direct URL access
• Click "Try Now" → "Generate" in left menu
• Remember to enable video sound effects switch
• Limited free credits daily

Free Alternatives

• Quicksodian: 7 days free unlimited use
• RunningHub: 1000 free credits on registration + 100 daily credits
• Use invitation links for bonus credits

API Access

• ComfyUI integration
• RunningHub workflows
• Other platforms (usually paid)

Final Thoughts

Wan 2.5 represents a significant evolution in AI video generation, but not in the way most people expected. The real innovation isn't in visual quality - it's in the seamless integration of audio, transforming video generation into a truly multimodal experience.

For projects requiring audio, Wan 2.5 is revolutionary. For purely visual content, Wan 2.2 remains a strong, competitive option that often delivers equal or superior results.

The choice between Wan 2.5 and Wan 2.2 isn't about which is "better" - it's about which features align with your specific project needs.

If you want to explore more, start from the Wan 2.5 home to see the full product surface, skim the Prompt Guide for phrasing that consistently lands good shots, deep‑dive into automation on Wan Animate, or keep the Wan 2.2 reference page handy when you need the older model’s stability. Pour nos lecteurs francophones : l’accueil français, le Guide des prompts FR, le hub Wan Animate FR et la page Wan 2.2 FR restent disponibles, tout comme la version française de cet article.

---

Want to test these models yourself? Try our AI Video Generator and experience the difference firsthand.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is Wan 2.5 worth upgrading to? A: If you need audio features, absolutely. For visual-only projects, Wan 2.2 remains highly competitive.

Q: Why isn't Wan 2.5 open-source? A: The developers haven't officially announced their reasoning, but it may be related to commercialization strategy.

Q: Can I use Wan 2.5 for free? A: Yes, through platforms like Quicksodian (7-day unlimited trial) or the official website (limited daily credits).

Q: Which model is better for realistic videos? A: Our tests show Wan 2.2 often produces more realistic results, particularly in physics simulation and natural motion.

Q: How important is the audio feature? A: Transformative for content creators, but not essential for all use cases. Evaluate based on your project requirements.